<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How The American Healthcare Crisis Began</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/how-the-american-healthcare-crisis-began/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/how-the-american-healthcare-crisis-began/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 20:09:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/how-the-american-healthcare-crisis-began/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=409#comment-318</guid>
		<description>Redmond, I wish you the best of luck, but I&#039;ve found that anyone who thinks Marxism-socialism-fascism-communism, when described as &quot;liberalism&quot; or &quot;moderate&quot; is somehow something other than its reality. In other words, &quot;true believers&quot; in the tenets of liberalism will never be swayed by facts or cogent thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redmond, I wish you the best of luck, but I&#8217;ve found that anyone who thinks Marxism-socialism-fascism-communism, when described as &#8220;liberalism&#8221; or &#8220;moderate&#8221; is somehow something other than its reality. In other words, &#8220;true believers&#8221; in the tenets of liberalism will never be swayed by facts or cogent thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redmond</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/how-the-american-healthcare-crisis-began/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Redmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=409#comment-317</guid>
		<description>Hi Dale

I hear you, I just couldn&#039;t resist - plus it gives me material for my blog.

In any case, maybe it will pre-empt the next set of comments from the next socialst... and give them food for thought, try to get them to direct their put their energies towards something productive, such as campaigning for Debra Medina in Texas. 
As opposed to liberating the proletariat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dale</p>
<p>I hear you, I just couldn&#8217;t resist &#8211; plus it gives me material for my blog.</p>
<p>In any case, maybe it will pre-empt the next set of comments from the next socialst&#8230; and give them food for thought, try to get them to direct their put their energies towards something productive, such as campaigning for Debra Medina in Texas.<br />
As opposed to liberating the proletariat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/how-the-american-healthcare-crisis-began/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=409#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Redmond, you shouldn&#039;t engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed socialist. Just let their idiotic comments speak for themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redmond, you shouldn&#8217;t engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed socialist. Just let their idiotic comments speak for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redmond</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/how-the-american-healthcare-crisis-began/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Redmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=409#comment-315</guid>
		<description>To Frederick

Have you read any of the posts on this site?

Or are you simply &quot;reading&quot; between the lines?

My guess is the latter.

&quot;Won’t be no taxes, Hamish! Just ask Dale.&quot;

Taxes are a way of the government saying to you - I know better than you how to spend your money - for your own good. Therefore taxes are a form of redistribution which is socialist. And since I have traded my life away for that money, the government had damn well spend it in my interests. 
Frederick, I am guessing that you are American. Let&#039;s see what your government is spending your money on, your life on - now I am making the assumption that you currently have a job, unlike 20% of Americans. Though maybe you are a student? Live with your parents?

The illegal war in Iraq and Afghanistan - $1.05 trillion.
Banker bailout - $23.7 trillion
Cash for &quot;clunkers&quot; - $24 000 per car
Nationalizing (sorry socializing) the car companies - $130 billion
Paying for secret CIA torture bases around the world - unknown, but they probably subsidize it with some drug running - oh whoops into America so it is another tax.
Prison-Industrial complex - sorry I couldn&#039;t find those numbers, but it is in the trillions I am sure.
Mercenaries- Blackwater has made $1 trillion in Iraq since 2004.
War on drugs- $19 billion in 2003
Shall I go on?
So is the US Government spending your money in your best interest? For your own good?
If I were you I would ask for some of your money back.
But don&#039;t worry, since the American people couldn&#039;t hope to ever pay that off, China has been nice enough to lend you the money. $772 billion in fact. Oh what&#039;s that? The PLA wants to dump US bonds and call the Americans bluff?
You see Frederick, the problem with debt is that you owe your life to that person who holds that debt, so you are a type of slave. Therefore the American government has made you a slave to China. Like being a Chinese slave? Maybe you could move there and get a job, I hear their economy is great! 10% growth!
With numbers like that, I would tend to agree with Grover Norquist when he said:
&quot;My goal is to cut government in half in twenty-five years, to get it down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub.&quot;
Unfortunately he is a useful idiot.
You continue:
&quot;Won’t be no government at all, in Ray’s world. He’s turning back time and undoing everything down to and including the pesky Civil War. After all, we have to have the God-given freedom to own slaves — it says it in the beloved Constitution.&quot;
As for there being government, as you can see from my list above, it would seem that the American people would be better without one, at least a federal one. Some of the states have enough sense to decriminalize marijuana. And they have their own national guard, so they could probably defend themselves from Mexico.
The constitution is goddless, as were the founding fathers, I suggest you read Ray&#039;s post on the &quot;goddless constitution&quot; or just read some history books. Of course it serves the interests of the &quot;left&quot; and &quot;right&quot; to continue to pretend that it is &quot;God&quot; given. It makes a nice talking point to the base.
Are you the base? Spouting talking points? Or do you think for yourself?
As for turning back the clock, I don&#039;t think Ray is suggesting that we re-institute slavery, merely that we should respect the constitution and enforce the rights enshrined in it.
Unlike what your criminal federal government is doing every day.
&quot;Or it did until the socialists amended it out.&quot;
Lincoln wasn&#039;t a socialist, he was a statist, and he was a racist. And as for socialists, I highly doubt you could call the American goverment of 1860 a socialist one. Did they even have income taxes back then? Actually income taxes didn&#039;t exist in America until 1913. You should look it up.
And it was because of the rights guaranteed in that constitution that the end of slavery was inevitable.
Why don&#039;t you ask all the slaves in Africa and around the world today how not having a written constitution with guaranteed rights for all is working out for them?
It looks like you have some things to think about.
Regards 
oh yeah I am going to put in a piece about the health care system in Canada - maybe on the weekend</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Frederick</p>
<p>Have you read any of the posts on this site?</p>
<p>Or are you simply &#8220;reading&#8221; between the lines?</p>
<p>My guess is the latter.</p>
<p>&#8220;Won’t be no taxes, Hamish! Just ask Dale.&#8221;</p>
<p>Taxes are a way of the government saying to you &#8211; I know better than you how to spend your money &#8211; for your own good. Therefore taxes are a form of redistribution which is socialist. And since I have traded my life away for that money, the government had damn well spend it in my interests. <br />
Frederick, I am guessing that you are American. Let&#8217;s see what your government is spending your money on, your life on &#8211; now I am making the assumption that you currently have a job, unlike 20% of Americans. Though maybe you are a student? Live with your parents?</p>
<p>The illegal war in Iraq and Afghanistan &#8211; $1.05 trillion.<br />
Banker bailout &#8211; $23.7 trillion<br />
Cash for &#8220;clunkers&#8221; &#8211; $24 000 per car<br />
Nationalizing (sorry socializing) the car companies &#8211; $130 billion<br />
Paying for secret CIA torture bases around the world &#8211; unknown, but they probably subsidize it with some drug running &#8211; oh whoops into America so it is another tax.<br />
Prison-Industrial complex &#8211; sorry I couldn&#8217;t find those numbers, but it is in the trillions I am sure.<br />
Mercenaries- Blackwater has made $1 trillion in Iraq since 2004.<br />
War on drugs- $19 billion in 2003<br />
Shall I go on?<br />
So is the US Government spending your money in your best interest? For your own good?<br />
If I were you I would ask for some of your money back.<br />
But don&#8217;t worry, since the American people couldn&#8217;t hope to ever pay that off, China has been nice enough to lend you the money. $772 billion in fact. Oh what&#8217;s that? The PLA wants to dump US bonds and call the Americans bluff?<br />
You see Frederick, the problem with debt is that you owe your life to that person who holds that debt, so you are a type of slave. Therefore the American government has made you a slave to China. Like being a Chinese slave? Maybe you could move there and get a job, I hear their economy is great! 10% growth!<br />
With numbers like that, I would tend to agree with Grover Norquist when he said:<br />
&#8220;My goal is to cut government in half in twenty-five years, to get it down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub.&#8221;<br />
Unfortunately he is a useful idiot.<br />
You continue:<br />
&#8220;Won’t be no government at all, in Ray’s world. He’s turning back time and undoing everything down to and including the pesky Civil War. After all, we have to have the God-given freedom to own slaves — it says it in the beloved Constitution.&#8221;<br />
As for there being government, as you can see from my list above, it would seem that the American people would be better without one, at least a federal one. Some of the states have enough sense to decriminalize marijuana. And they have their own national guard, so they could probably defend themselves from Mexico.<br />
The constitution is goddless, as were the founding fathers, I suggest you read Ray&#8217;s post on the &#8220;goddless constitution&#8221; or just read some history books. Of course it serves the interests of the &#8220;left&#8221; and &#8220;right&#8221; to continue to pretend that it is &#8220;God&#8221; given. It makes a nice talking point to the base.<br />
Are you the base? Spouting talking points? Or do you think for yourself?<br />
As for turning back the clock, I don&#8217;t think Ray is suggesting that we re-institute slavery, merely that we should respect the constitution and enforce the rights enshrined in it.<br />
Unlike what your criminal federal government is doing every day.<br />
&#8220;Or it did until the socialists amended it out.&#8221;<br />
Lincoln wasn&#8217;t a socialist, he was a statist, and he was a racist. And as for socialists, I highly doubt you could call the American goverment of 1860 a socialist one. Did they even have income taxes back then? Actually income taxes didn&#8217;t exist in America until 1913. You should look it up.<br />
And it was because of the rights guaranteed in that constitution that the end of slavery was inevitable.<br />
Why don&#8217;t you ask all the slaves in Africa and around the world today how not having a written constitution with guaranteed rights for all is working out for them?<br />
It looks like you have some things to think about.<br />
Regards <br />
oh yeah I am going to put in a piece about the health care system in Canada &#8211; maybe on the weekend</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fredrick Douglas</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/how-the-american-healthcare-crisis-began/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredrick Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=409#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Won&#039;t be no taxes, Hamish! Just ask Dale. Won&#039;t be no government at all, in Ray&#039;s world. He’s turning back time and undoing everything down to and including the pesky Civil War. After all, we have to have the God-given freedom to own slaves -- it says it in the beloved Constitution. Or it did until the socialists amended it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won&#8217;t be no taxes, Hamish! Just ask Dale. Won&#8217;t be no government at all, in Ray&#8217;s world. He’s turning back time and undoing everything down to and including the pesky Civil War. After all, we have to have the God-given freedom to own slaves &#8212; it says it in the beloved Constitution. Or it did until the socialists amended it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/how-the-american-healthcare-crisis-began/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=409#comment-309</guid>
		<description>What you&#039;re describing, Hamish, is what economists sometimes call the Licensing Law Monopoly, and it&#039;s one of the three main components (along with unsound insurance practices and tax discrimination laws which have been in place since the 1930&#039;s) that&#039;s at the root of the problem. 

Here&#039;s the solution: 

Do away with &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; licensing requirements for hospitals and medical doctors. This will rapidly increase supply, and prices will rapidly fall. Also, a vastly greater variety of healthcare services will open up before our very eyes.

&lt;em&gt;Competing voluntary accreditation agencies would take the place of compulsory government licensing -- if health care providers believe that such accreditation would enhance their own reputation, and that their consumers care about reputation, and are willing to pay for it. Because consumers would no longer be duped into believing that there is such a thing as a &quot;national standard&quot; of health care, they will increase their search costs and make more discriminating health care choices&lt;/em&gt; (Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Professor of economics, UNLV).

As it now stands and as you point out, the AMA, in collaboration with the government, artificially restricts the number of openings in medical schools. This reduces the doctor supply, which in turn increases the cost of healthcare. Understand, though, &lt;i&gt;this is all artificially created in the first place,&lt;/i&gt; through government manipulation and coercion, and specifically, the Licensing Law Monopoly. 

You&#039;re right: the expensive healthcare we now have is in large measure the result of an artificially created shortage of doctors, nurses, hospitals, pharmacists, et cetera, which the AMA licensing cartel and other government institutions have brought about.

Vet: Thank you for your service and your sacrifice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you&#8217;re describing, Hamish, is what economists sometimes call the Licensing Law Monopoly, and it&#8217;s one of the three main components (along with unsound insurance practices and tax discrimination laws which have been in place since the 1930&#8242;s) that&#8217;s at the root of the problem. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the solution: </p>
<p>Do away with <i>all</i> licensing requirements for hospitals and medical doctors. This will rapidly increase supply, and prices will rapidly fall. Also, a vastly greater variety of healthcare services will open up before our very eyes.</p>
<p><em>Competing voluntary accreditation agencies would take the place of compulsory government licensing &#8212; if health care providers believe that such accreditation would enhance their own reputation, and that their consumers care about reputation, and are willing to pay for it. Because consumers would no longer be duped into believing that there is such a thing as a &#8220;national standard&#8221; of health care, they will increase their search costs and make more discriminating health care choices</em> (Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Professor of economics, UNLV).</p>
<p>As it now stands and as you point out, the AMA, in collaboration with the government, artificially restricts the number of openings in medical schools. This reduces the doctor supply, which in turn increases the cost of healthcare. Understand, though, <i>this is all artificially created in the first place,</i> through government manipulation and coercion, and specifically, the Licensing Law Monopoly. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right: the expensive healthcare we now have is in large measure the result of an artificially created shortage of doctors, nurses, hospitals, pharmacists, et cetera, which the AMA licensing cartel and other government institutions have brought about.</p>
<p>Vet: Thank you for your service and your sacrifice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamish</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/how-the-american-healthcare-crisis-began/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=409#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Something else that could be done to help the crisis:
 
Add incentives for students to join the medical profession. This would increase the number of doctors and nurses needed for the increase in patients. This could be as simple as a tax deduction for tuition. If we can give a tax deduction for charitable work, then a tax deduction to get students into the profession could work as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something else that could be done to help the crisis:</p>
<p>Add incentives for students to join the medical profession. This would increase the number of doctors and nurses needed for the increase in patients. This could be as simple as a tax deduction for tuition. If we can give a tax deduction for charitable work, then a tax deduction to get students into the profession could work as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vet</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/how-the-american-healthcare-crisis-began/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Vet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=409#comment-307</guid>
		<description>As a Paralyzed Veteran, I totally understand the current health care system. I also understand that if I were to loose my Veterans Fee Basis coverage that allows me to use private physicians closer to home, I would then have to use my Medicare Coverage. My current doctor would have to release me as her patient after 14 years, because she isn’t allowed to accept any more Medicare patients per group limits. My neurologist looses money with every Medicaid patient just paying the staff to set up the files and paperwork for the appointment.

The low paying government is the cause of the high charges to the private insurance sector.

Government pays for non productivity when it is a Federal Employee. Making positions and purchases to spend their budget maximum. It is possible to find productive qualified workers, but there is no such thing as firing a federal employee. They are only transferred to another department. I watched it happen with a Director of a VA Hospital, till they caught him embezzling. The government isn’t able to close it’s loop holes and watch over the systems that is currently in place. Fraud isn’t even trackable with authentic doctors identification. How could the new system keep track?

I feel that the idea should be dumped till they get their current house in order. I’m not fighting for myself but for those that have no idea what they are fixing to get into, I’m already stuck. The one percent can not continue to cover the never ending costs that our government taxes on them. Tax deductions would be great, but the majority that are pressing for this new health care plan do not pay taxes or only use the simple tax forms. They live in apartments and many are single parents that are just above the Medicaid limit. They will suck the system dry and then the mass will be taxed to pay for the costs.

Local south border Hospitals and states are broke because of the laws that allow a pregnant women to come to the border and an ambulance must be called so she can deliver her child in the USA. Then her child will be sent to the border crossing everyday to attend school. The local school district must accept these children and bus them. There is not one cent provided by that family to cover the costs of education or feeding that child for the next 15 years. Yes, 2 years of Head Start, Kindergarten and 12 more years.

If the government is the cause of the problem, how the heck can anyone believe they have the ability to fix it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Paralyzed Veteran, I totally understand the current health care system. I also understand that if I were to loose my Veterans Fee Basis coverage that allows me to use private physicians closer to home, I would then have to use my Medicare Coverage. My current doctor would have to release me as her patient after 14 years, because she isn’t allowed to accept any more Medicare patients per group limits. My neurologist looses money with every Medicaid patient just paying the staff to set up the files and paperwork for the appointment.</p>
<p>The low paying government is the cause of the high charges to the private insurance sector.</p>
<p>Government pays for non productivity when it is a Federal Employee. Making positions and purchases to spend their budget maximum. It is possible to find productive qualified workers, but there is no such thing as firing a federal employee. They are only transferred to another department. I watched it happen with a Director of a VA Hospital, till they caught him embezzling. The government isn’t able to close it’s loop holes and watch over the systems that is currently in place. Fraud isn’t even trackable with authentic doctors identification. How could the new system keep track?</p>
<p>I feel that the idea should be dumped till they get their current house in order. I’m not fighting for myself but for those that have no idea what they are fixing to get into, I’m already stuck. The one percent can not continue to cover the never ending costs that our government taxes on them. Tax deductions would be great, but the majority that are pressing for this new health care plan do not pay taxes or only use the simple tax forms. They live in apartments and many are single parents that are just above the Medicaid limit. They will suck the system dry and then the mass will be taxed to pay for the costs.</p>
<p>Local south border Hospitals and states are broke because of the laws that allow a pregnant women to come to the border and an ambulance must be called so she can deliver her child in the USA. Then her child will be sent to the border crossing everyday to attend school. The local school district must accept these children and bus them. There is not one cent provided by that family to cover the costs of education or feeding that child for the next 15 years. Yes, 2 years of Head Start, Kindergarten and 12 more years.</p>
<p>If the government is the cause of the problem, how the heck can anyone believe they have the ability to fix it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/how-the-american-healthcare-crisis-began/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=409#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Dale wrote: &gt; What, you some kind of laissez-nous faire nut?

Guilty as charged.


Dale wrote: &gt; Twice the displacement – hey, that’s my story! 

And a very fine story it is. So fine, in fact, that I called it back.

Thank you for dropping by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dale wrote: > What, you some kind of laissez-nous faire nut?</p>
<p>Guilty as charged.</p>
<p>Dale wrote: > Twice the displacement – hey, that’s my story! </p>
<p>And a very fine story it is. So fine, in fact, that I called it back.</p>
<p>Thank you for dropping by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/how-the-american-healthcare-crisis-began/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=409#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Now now, there you go looking at history and analyzing the facts. This is the act of someone who wants to understand the problem and actually try to solve it. Clearly this has no place in Ameri-Marxist politics.

First of all, the only apparent demon is the government, and we all know our government is benevolent, well-intentioned, and incapable of error (unless it was Bush, of course). So, your position is fundamentally flawed, which discounts all those silly facts you were throwing around. Lacking a capitalist demon, you fail the first rule of Marxism.

Secondly, you fail to understand the basic tenet that we can only accomplish good-sounding ideological goals by force of government. You seem to think that if we removed the causal social engineering (i.e. discriminatory and controlling pre-tax here, post-tax there) that capitalism would self-correct its market problems. Again, you implicitly dispute the premise &quot;only government&quot; can solve our problems, so you fail the second rule of Marxism, which requires socialist totalitarianism.

What, you some kind of laissez-nous faire nut?
Twice the displacement - hey, that&#039;s my story!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now now, there you go looking at history and analyzing the facts. This is the act of someone who wants to understand the problem and actually try to solve it. Clearly this has no place in Ameri-Marxist politics.</p>
<p>First of all, the only apparent demon is the government, and we all know our government is benevolent, well-intentioned, and incapable of error (unless it was Bush, of course). So, your position is fundamentally flawed, which discounts all those silly facts you were throwing around. Lacking a capitalist demon, you fail the first rule of Marxism.</p>
<p>Secondly, you fail to understand the basic tenet that we can only accomplish good-sounding ideological goals by force of government. You seem to think that if we removed the causal social engineering (i.e. discriminatory and controlling pre-tax here, post-tax there) that capitalism would self-correct its market problems. Again, you implicitly dispute the premise &#8220;only government&#8221; can solve our problems, so you fail the second rule of Marxism, which requires socialist totalitarianism.</p>
<p>What, you some kind of laissez-nous faire nut?<br />
Twice the displacement &#8211; hey, that&#8217;s my story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henery Schaffer</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/how-the-american-healthcare-crisis-began/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Henery Schaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=409#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

I looked over your blog and it looks really good.  Do you ever do link exchanges on your blog roll?  If you do, I&#039;d like to exchange links with you.

Let me know if you&#039;re interested.

Thanks..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I looked over your blog and it looks really good.  Do you ever do link exchanges on your blog roll?  If you do, I&#8217;d like to exchange links with you.</p>
<p>Let me know if you&#8217;re interested.</p>
<p>Thanks..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

