<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Metaphysics: Theory of Everything</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/metaphysics-theory-of-everything/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/metaphysics-theory-of-everything/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 20:09:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/metaphysics-theory-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-2842</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 19:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=466#comment-2842</guid>
		<description>What is, Lorne?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is, Lorne?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorne</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/metaphysics-theory-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-2841</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 03:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=466#comment-2841</guid>
		<description>Thats debatable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats debatable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/metaphysics-theory-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-2835</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=466#comment-2835</guid>
		<description>Old Monty Python Flying Circus skit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old Monty Python Flying Circus skit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/metaphysics-theory-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-2833</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=466#comment-2833</guid>
		<description>Christ, friend, what was that little piece of magic inspired by?

Thank &lt;em&gt;you.&lt;/em&gt; And thank you for dropping by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christ, friend, what was that little piece of magic inspired by?</p>
<p>Thank <em>you.</em> And thank you for dropping by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/metaphysics-theory-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-2832</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=466#comment-2832</guid>
		<description>Art Critic: 

Some people have made the mistake of seeing Shunt&#039;s work as a load of rubbish about railway timetables, but clever people like me, who talk loudly in restaurants, see this as a deliberate ambiguity, a plea for understanding in a mechanized world. The points are frozen, the beast is dead. What is the difference? What indeed is the point? The point is frozen, the beast is late out of Paddington. The point is taken. If La Fontaine&#039;s elk would spurn Tom Jones the engine must be our head, the dining car our oesophagus, the guard&#039;s van our left lung, the cattle truck our shins, the first-class compartment the piece of skin at the nape of the neck and the level crossing an electric elk called Simon. The clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It&#039;s over there in a box. Shunt is saying the 8.15 from Gillingham when in reality he means the 8.13 from Gillingham. The train is the same only the time is altered. Ecce homo, ergo elk. La Fontaine knew his sister and knew her bloody well. The point is taken, the beast is moulting, the fluff gets up your nose. The illusion is complete; it is reality, the reality is illusion and the ambiguity is the only truth. But is the truth, as Hitchcock observes, in the box? No there isn&#039;t room, the ambiguity has put on weight. The point is taken, the elk is dead, the beast stops at Swindon, Chabrol stops at nothing, I&#039;m having treatment and La Fontaine can get knotted.


Sorry, I couldn&#039;t resist.


Well, I could but I didn&#039;t which when it comes to reality is the same thing.


Well, perhaps not the same thing, but close.  At least you can see it from there.


But like Hitchcock, it&#039;s not a pretty sight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art Critic: </p>
<p>Some people have made the mistake of seeing Shunt&#8217;s work as a load of rubbish about railway timetables, but clever people like me, who talk loudly in restaurants, see this as a deliberate ambiguity, a plea for understanding in a mechanized world. The points are frozen, the beast is dead. What is the difference? What indeed is the point? The point is frozen, the beast is late out of Paddington. The point is taken. If La Fontaine&#8217;s elk would spurn Tom Jones the engine must be our head, the dining car our oesophagus, the guard&#8217;s van our left lung, the cattle truck our shins, the first-class compartment the piece of skin at the nape of the neck and the level crossing an electric elk called Simon. The clarity is devastating. But where is the ambiguity? It&#8217;s over there in a box. Shunt is saying the 8.15 from Gillingham when in reality he means the 8.13 from Gillingham. The train is the same only the time is altered. Ecce homo, ergo elk. La Fontaine knew his sister and knew her bloody well. The point is taken, the beast is moulting, the fluff gets up your nose. The illusion is complete; it is reality, the reality is illusion and the ambiguity is the only truth. But is the truth, as Hitchcock observes, in the box? No there isn&#8217;t room, the ambiguity has put on weight. The point is taken, the elk is dead, the beast stops at Swindon, Chabrol stops at nothing, I&#8217;m having treatment and La Fontaine can get knotted.</p>
<p>Sorry, I couldn&#8217;t resist.</p>
<p>Well, I could but I didn&#8217;t which when it comes to reality is the same thing.</p>
<p>Well, perhaps not the same thing, but close.  At least you can see it from there.</p>
<p>But like Hitchcock, it&#8217;s not a pretty sight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Costa</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/metaphysics-theory-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-2830</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=466#comment-2830</guid>
		<description>Friend,


&quot;True&quot; by what our senses intent to known as the &quot;every&quot; but will not be multiply universes one face of this unique reality?


Best Regards!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friend,</p>
<p>&#8220;True&#8221; by what our senses intent to known as the &#8220;every&#8221; but will not be multiply universes one face of this unique reality?</p>
<p>Best Regards!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denny</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/metaphysics-theory-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 04:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=466#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Ray,

Interesting and with Truth! I would say that &quot;perception&quot; is what one takes of &quot;Reality&quot;. To perceive one has to be aware! For otherwise &quot;Nothing&quot; would encompass one&#039;s idealogy. &quot;Self-Realization&quot; is a &quot;key&quot; factor towards belief in the Universe. True, it doesn&#039;t change the fact the physical world is there is an experience thru one&#039;s &quot;senses&quot;. Human&#039;s desire to explore is His &quot;self-preservation&quot; towards Himself and the Species! Without this Human&#039;s would not continue to exsist.
 
Marshep, it&#039;s good to know you&#039;re still around, I miss your comments as well...

Best of Regards My Friend,
Denny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray,</p>
<p>Interesting and with Truth! I would say that &#8220;perception&#8221; is what one takes of &#8220;Reality&#8221;. To perceive one has to be aware! For otherwise &#8220;Nothing&#8221; would encompass one&#8217;s idealogy. &#8220;Self-Realization&#8221; is a &#8220;key&#8221; factor towards belief in the Universe. True, it doesn&#8217;t change the fact the physical world is there is an experience thru one&#8217;s &#8220;senses&#8221;. Human&#8217;s desire to explore is His &#8220;self-preservation&#8221; towards Himself and the Species! Without this Human&#8217;s would not continue to exsist.</p>
<p>Marshep, it&#8217;s good to know you&#8217;re still around, I miss your comments as well&#8230;</p>
<p>Best of Regards My Friend,<br />
Denny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BedazzledCrone</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/metaphysics-theory-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>BedazzledCrone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=466#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Take that BedazzledCrone!!!! Ray we know that I will have a lengthy response to this one in the future - stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take that BedazzledCrone!!!! Ray we know that I will have a lengthy response to this one in the future &#8211; stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JA</title>
		<link>http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2010/02/metaphysics-theory-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>JA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayharvey.org/?p=466#comment-417</guid>
		<description>Moon&#039;s movement viewed from the Sun.
A gigantic wave function of a particle, the Moon has done.
Pouring metaphors and hypotheses... and the collisions.

A probability... 

we make our final concessions.
And a perfect stopline of human contemplation,rushing towards that unrealistic adaptability and conciliation.

Fire...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moon&#8217;s movement viewed from the Sun.<br />
A gigantic wave function of a particle, the Moon has done.<br />
Pouring metaphors and hypotheses&#8230; and the collisions.</p>
<p>A probability&#8230; </p>
<p>we make our final concessions.<br />
And a perfect stopline of human contemplation,rushing towards that unrealistic adaptability and conciliation.</p>
<p>Fire&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

