Invoking the spirit of the wartime generation, Dalton McGuinty yesterday called on Ontarians to make the necessary sacrifices to create a better future for the province.
The Premier said each generation has challenges and sacrifices that have to be made for the common good. And just as parents, grandparents and great grandparents battled through war and depression to ensure a better future, the time has come for this generation to do its part.
He said Ontarians should see tough economic measures, like the HST, as the kind of sacrifice that will create a better future for the next generation.
Mr. McGuinty said a high dollar, high energy costs that are going to get even higher, government deficits, and ballooning health-care costs have combined to create a dramatically different challenge for Ontarians.

Had the reds figured this out back then, where would we be now? Their failure is what is driving the success today because their failure gave the neo-socialists something with which to work from. They learned from their past failures that people must give up their freedom willingly, and to do so they must be convinced that what they are doing is right. It’s basic psychology run completely amok, and if people could put their hearts aside for a moment and simply look at what’s happening they should be offended that they are being had by a bunch of liars using slight of hand. If the people could only open their eyes and see that the truth is being obfuscated behind a thin web of emotion and high school-level psychology, they would be outraged. Yet, we are faced with a problem in that they have figured out that it is difficult to get people to question their hearts, and as long as the left controls the heart, they control the future of our freedom.

The only way to end it is to sever the puppet strings of the new socialist movement and attack it at its source. The global warming fiasco has already shown us that we cannot go after the followers as they ignore the facts and run with the lies because the lies appeal to their hearts. This is not new, but the past is frequently forgotten, and people don’t recognize when they are reliving history’s worst blunders. Just ask the Nazi-era Germans what happens when the heart is used to control the masses. The people must be shown that force comes in many forms, and manipulating the heart is perhaps the worst face of force.

Dirk wrote: > It is as ridiculous as his former article about how slavery became a legal institution.

Click-click

Writing your latest polemic no doubt?

So is this your attempt at a polemic?
a person who argues in opposition to another; controversialist.

I woke, and to my horror, there you were again, trying to make environmentalists into socialists, once again.

They are.
From Patrick Moore
Secondly, following the falling of the Berlin wall, and the end of the peace movement, and the end of radical socialist politics in the labour and women’s movement, an awful lot of those people drifted into environmentalism. It’s been highjacked by political and social activists who are using environmental rhetoric to cloak agendas that have more to do with anti-corporate and class warfare than they do with ecology or saving the environment.
I just realised that all you did was copy and paste “Dirk”’s comments from a “brief history of Environmentalism – very lazy.

Let’s say that, for sake of argument, Marx and Thoreau and John Muir (an absolute saint) and the others are the founders of these two philosophies. (Play along just for a bit). Walden came out in 1845, whereas Marx’s earlier texts regarding economics came out in roughly 1844; so, we see that they were contemporaries and might have been aware of each other’s works.

Ray already refuted this part.
Ray’s rebuttal
But I will continue.

In his inmature book Leave Us Alone,

You could have at least spell checked this post before pasting it.

Ray Harvey writes: “Death by starvation, once commonplace, has been eradicated.”
They must want for newspapers because in Darfur there is a current famine raging. But really, if you look at it, the famine is caused because tribes are living on oil-rich lands. But Reagan and Ray don’t pause for nuance. They truly are busy beavers. We all remember Reagan’s “No one goes to bed hungry in America.”

How many people in the first world are starving? Or in the second?
The reason that people in the third world are starving is because there is no respect for private property rights, or the rule of law.
Of course all that foreign aid, disrupting the local markets, and suppressing the price of local foodstuffs does not help – it creates an incentive to remain dependent – much like all entitlements.
In the words of James Shikwati – speaking on foreign aid to Africa
Shikwati: … for God’s sake, please just stop.
Here is a nice personal attack – attack the man, not the idea

Friends, I realize that Ray Harvey comes across as “intelligent,” or whatever;

You should try corresponding with him – very nice person, and intelligent.

Now put all of the above in your ass and smoke it.

Smoke Marijuana? You sound like a libertarian!

Sorry to intrude here, but when I smelled pomade (sour as usual) and wine cork I knew you had another late night last night. Writing your latest polemic no doubt? I woke, and to my horror, there you were again, trying to make environmentalists into socialists, once again.

Let’s say that, for sake of argument, Marx and Thoreau and John Muir (an absolute saint) and the others are the founders of these two philosophies. (Play along just for a bit). Walden came out in 1845, whereas Marx’s earlier texts regarding economics came out in roughly 1844; so, we see that they were contemporaries and might have been aware of each other’s works. Marx often said that only with the rise of the proletariat (you and me) could a society defeat the absolutism of traditional rule (Dick Cheney). Thoreau was into transcendentalism, a European concept that rejected traditional religion and government and said that man, as an individual, had to live his life according to time-tested principles, not external forces like the Frazier Institute. I will also add that John Muir loved individual freedom more than anyone. And Thoreau too (he was jailed for rejecting taxes — the Poll Tax) and he was especially peeved at the state of Mass. where they had just passed a law stating that all escaped slaves had to be returned to the South. (He was an abolitionist, too, you know that, right, you sonofabitch?) After all, slaves were private property, part of the free market; Thoreau never accepted that concept. Have you or your huge audience ever heard of “Civil Disobedience” and the concept of self-reliance? These came from people like Thoreau, the grandfather of environmentalism, the first American to really understand the weight of individual freedom.

From roughly 1845, Environmentalism (though no one called it that at the time) went one way, while socialism went another. I regret that environmentalism, corrupted by marketing, has become more associated with bungee jumping and knee-jerk urges to run and sing naked among the grizzlies. (It seems to me that what Muir and Thoreau and others required and advocated about self-reliance has long since been jettisoned by those who see environmentalism as some sort of exclusive individual expression. But to suggest, as you constantly do, that environmentalism suddenly popped up when communism began to fail, is a joke. Only a true sonofabitch would propose such a thing. My biggest fear is that some of your more gullible audience members might go for it. Let me warn you all, don’t buy what Ray Harvey is selling here. It is as ridiculous as his former article about how slavery became a legal institution.

Now check this out:

In his inmature book Leave Us Alone, the grey-faced bartender wrote, “Private property is the crux of freedom. You cannot, in any meaningful sense, be said to be free if you do not possess the right to those things necessary to sustain your life.”

Really, I thought it was guns. That is why I bought another Browning yesterday, punk. And I’m a dead eye.

The nigh slumbering bartender penned, ““Control the property, control the person,” said Lenin,correctly.”

Others, say the same about religion and media. You could say, “Control the XYZ, and you control the person.” For example, control the porn, and you control most of your customers.” Or, control the Miller Lite, and you control your mamma.” See. It’s easy, not very bright either.

In the wee hours, Ray Harvey channels the late Julian Simon of University of Maryland and together on state funds, with the dead man’s ghastly hand on Harvey’s hand, they together wrote… “There is a million times more clean potable water. There’s instant hot or cold water. There’s instant light at the flick of a switch.”

Not at my house, bitch. And, just FYI, if it’s potable, then it stands to reason that it’s clean. LMAO!!

Ray Harvey writes: “Death by starvation, once commonplace, has been eradicated.”

They must want for newspapers because in Darfur there is a current famine raging. But really, if you look at it, the famine is caused because tribes are living on oil-rich lands. But Reagan and Ray don’t pause for nuance. They truly are busy beavers. We all remember Reagan’s “No one goes to bed hungry in America.”

Friends, I realize that Ray Harvey comes across as “intelligent,” or whatever; I realize that his writing is chosen for awards and accolades that I can only envy, but some of the recent stuff he’s selling is just pure shit. Just shit. I can only hope that you (if not he) wakes up and moves on to reality.

Now put all of the above in your ass and smoke it.

“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of,” Ginsburg told Emily Bazelon of the New York Times.

Oooo, thats just creapy man. Boys of brazil creapy, really creapy.

“the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”

Barack and Michelle?

Al and Tipper ?