{"id":1991,"date":"2011-04-12T14:59:42","date_gmt":"2011-04-12T20:59:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rayharvey.org\/?p=1991"},"modified":"2011-04-14T03:27:31","modified_gmt":"2011-04-14T09:27:31","slug":"un-document-would-give-mother-earth-same-rights-as-humans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rayharvey.org\/index.php\/2011\/04\/un-document-would-give-mother-earth-same-rights-as-humans\/","title":{"rendered":"UN Document Would Give ‘Mother Earth’ Same Rights As Humans"},"content":{"rendered":"

This is for all the folks out there — you know who you are — who over the years have told me that I caricaturize environmentalism and environmentalists; that I present the environmental position “unfairly,” as “too extreme” when I call it what it actually is<\/a>: namely, neo-Marxism at its blackest, a quasi-secular religion that hates human beings and worships at the shrine of death — e.g.: \u201cHuman beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs\u201d (John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal).<\/p>\n

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself” (Al Gore, Club of Rome executive member).<\/p>\n

\u201cMankind is a cancer; we\u2019re the biggest blight on the face of the earth\u201d (president of PETA and environmental activist Ingrid Newkirk).<\/p>\n

\u201cIf you haven\u2019t given voluntary human extinction much thought before, the idea of a world with no people in it may seem strange. But, if you give it a chance, I think you might agree that the extinction of Homo Sapiens would mean survival for millions, if not billions, of Earth-dwelling species\u2026. Phasing out the human race will solve every problem on earth, social and environmental\u201d (Ibid).<\/p>\n

Quoting Richard Conniff, in the pages of Audubon magazine (September, 1990): \u201cAmong environmentalists sharing two or three beers, the notion is quite common that if only some calamity could wipe out the entire human race, other species might once again have a chance.\u201d<\/p>\n

Environmental theorist Christopher Manes (writing under the nom-de-guerre Miss Ann Thropy): \u201cIf radical environmentalists were to invent a disease to bring human population back to ecological sanity, it would probably be something like AIDS.\u201d<\/p>\n

Environmental guru \u201cReverend\u201d Thomas Berry, proclaims that \u201chumans are an affliction of the world, its demonic presence. We are the violators of Earth\u2019s most sacred aspects.\u201d<\/p>\n

A speaker at one of Earth First!\u2019s little cult gatherings: \u201cOptimal human population: zero.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cOurs is an ecological perspective that views Earth as a community and recognizes such apparent enemies as \u2018disease\u2019 (e.g., malaria) and \u2018pests\u2019 (e.g., mosquitoes) not as manifestations of evil to be overcome but rather as vital and necessary components of a complex and vibrant biosphere \u2026 [We have] an antipathy to \u2018progress\u2019 and \u2018technology.\u2019 We can accept the pejoratives of \u2018Luddite\u2019 and \u2018Neanderthal\u2019 with pride\u2026. There is no hope for reform of industrial empire\u2026. We humans have become a disease: the Humanpox\u201d (Dave Foreman, past head of Earth First!)<\/p>\n

\u201cHuman happiness [is] not as important as a wild and healthy planet. I know social scientists who remind me that people are part of nature, but it isn\u2019t true. Somewhere along the line we \u2026 became a cancer. We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth\u2026. Until such time as Homo Sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along.\u201d (Biologist David Graber, \u201cMother Nature as a Hothouse Flower\u201d Los Angles Times Book Review).<\/p>\n

\u201cThe ending of the human epoch on Earth would most likely be greeted with a hearty \u2018Good riddance!\u2019\u201d(Paul Taylor, \u201cRespect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics\u201d). <\/p>\n

\u201cIf we don\u2019t overthrow capitalism, we don\u2019t have a chance of saving the world ecologically. I think it is possible to have an ecologically sound society under socialism. I don\u2019t think it is possible under capitalism\u201d (Judi Bari, of Earth First!).<\/p>\n

\u201cIsn\u2019t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn\u2019t it our responsibility to bring that about?\u201d (Maurice Strong, Earth Summit 91).<\/p>\n

David Brower, former head of the Sierra Club and founder of Friends of the Earth, calls for developers to be \u201cshot with tranquilizer guns.\u201d<\/p>\n

Why?<\/p>\n

\u201cHuman suffering is much less important than the suffering of the planet,\u201d he explains.<\/p>\n

Also from David Brower, Executive Director of the socialist Sierra Club: \u201cThe goal now is a socialist, redistributionist society, which is nature\u2019s proper steward and society\u2019s only hope.\u201d<\/p>\n

Quoting the Green Party\u2019s first Presidential candidate Barry Commoner:<\/p>\n

\u201cNothing less than a change in the political and social system, including revision of the Constitution, is necessary to save the country from destroying the natural environment\u2026. Capitalism is the earth\u2019s number one enemy.\u201d<\/p>\n

From Barry Commoner again:<\/p>\n

\u201cEnvironmental pollution is a sign of major incompatibility between our system of production and the environmental system that supports it. [The socialist way is better because] the theory of socialist economics does not appear to require that growth should continue indefinitely.\u201d<\/p>\n

So much for your unalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Indeed:<\/p>\n

\u201cIndividual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective\u201d (Harvey Ruvin, International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, Dade County Florida).<\/p>\n

Sierra Club cofounder David Brower, pushing for his own brand of eugenics:<\/p>\n

\u201cChildbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.\u201d<\/p>\n

That, if you don\u2019t know, is limited government environmentalist style.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s nothing wrong with being a terrorist, as long as you win. Then you write history\u201d (Sierra Club board member Paul Watson).<\/p>\n

Again from Paul Watson, writing in that propaganda rag Earth First! Journal: \u201cRight now we\u2019re in the early stages of World War III\u2026. It\u2019s the war to save the planet. The environmental movement doesn\u2019t have many deserters and has a high level of recruitment. Eventually there will be open war.\u201d<\/p>\n

And:<\/p>\n

\u201cBy every means necessary we will bring this and every other empire down! Mutiny and sabotage in defense of Mother Earth!\u201d<\/p>\n

And so on<\/a>.<\/p>\n

But, Ray, this is just the extremist fringe; these folks do not represent the true spirit of the environmental movement, as a reader of this website once told me. <\/p>\n

Uh-huh. I suggest you keep telling yourself that so that you don’t have to confront the totality of the philosophy you’ve accepted. <\/p>\n

And now there’s this:<\/p>\n

UN document would give ‘Mother Earth’ same rights as humans:<\/b><\/p>\n

UNITED NATIONS \u2014 Bolivia will this month table a draft United Nations treaty giving “Mother Earth” the same rights as humans \u2014 having just passed a domestic law that does the same for bugs, trees and all other natural things in the South American country.<\/p>\n

The bid aims to have the UN recognize the Earth as a living entity that humans have sought to “dominate and exploit” \u2014 to the point that the “well-being and existence of many beings” is now threatened.<\/p>\n

The wording may yet evolve, but the general structure is meant to mirror Bolivia’s Law of the Rights of Mother Earth, which Bolivian President Evo Morales enacted in January.<\/p>\n

That document speaks of the country’s natural resources as “blessings,” and grants the Earth a series of specific rights that include rights to life, water and clean air; the right to repair livelihoods affected by human activities; and the right to be free from pollution.<\/p>\n

It also establishes a Ministry of Mother Earth, and provides the planet with an ombudsman whose job is to hear nature’s complaints as voiced by activist and other groups, including the state.<\/p>\n

“If you want to have balance, and you think that the only (entities) who have rights are humans or companies, then how can you reach balance?” Pablo Salon, Bolivia’s ambassador to the UN, told Postmedia News. “But if you recognize that nature too has rights, and (if you provide) legal forms to protect and preserve those rights, then you can achieve balance.”<\/p>\n

The application of the law appears destined to pose new challenges for companies operating in the country, which is rich in natural resources, including natural gas and lithium, but remains one of the poorest in Latin America.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read the full article here<\/a>. <\/p>\n

This, what you just read above, is merely the logical elaboration of the mainstream environmental philosophy, and, among many, many other things, it demonstrates a profound and fatal misunderstanding of the concept of rights<\/a>, which by definition are compossible.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This is for all the folks out there — you know who you are — who over the years have told me that I caricaturize environmentalism and environmentalists; that I present the environmental position “unfairly,” as “too extreme” when I call it what it actually is: namely, neo-Marxism at its blackest, a quasi-secular religion that … <\/p>\n

Continue reading “UN Document Would Give ‘Mother Earth’ Same Rights As Humans”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[143,116,47,218],"tags":[211,452,1539,748,1538,451,441,1541,435,440,1536,448,1540,436,1535,1542,416,1537,2609,1534],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rayharvey.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1991"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rayharvey.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rayharvey.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rayharvey.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rayharvey.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1991"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rayharvey.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1991\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rayharvey.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1991"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rayharvey.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1991"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rayharvey.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1991"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}